Articles, Tax Practice Guides & Checklists, Comment Letters, Tools, etc.Discussion Forum, Tax Committees, Member PublicationsAICPA ConferencesTax Section Membership info.Publications, CPE, and Conferences
 
Search

Printer Friendly View

Tax E-Alerts

News you can use on tax regulations, court decisions, legislation, and practice management.

Read the Alerts




As a tax practitioner, you may have contemplated adding personal financial planning services to your practice. There is a natural progression to go from being your client's most trusted tax advisor to also being their most trusted personal financial advisor. But you have questions: will it be profitable? How do I get started? What are other CPA firms doing? All of these questions are addressed in a new research study published by the AICPA's PFP Section that can show you how to expand your services into this lucrative niche area that is a great compliment to your tax practice.

The Personal Financial Planning Section of AICPA and Moss Adams LLP are pleased to announce the results of their first joint study of CPA financial planning and advisory practices- AICPA/Moss Adams CPA Financial Planning Practice Study.

Click here for more information

 

January 12, 2006
Tax Court Allows 35 Percent Combined Discount for FLP

In the latest Tax Court family limited partnership (FLP) case, Estate of Webster E. Kelley et al. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2005-235; No. 16894-03), the Tax Court determined the fair market value of a decedent's interest in the FLP based solely on section 2031, with IRS conceding on section 2036, which had been the Code section applied in most of the other recent FLP cases this year. The Tax Court allowed a combined 35 percent discount (12 percent minority discount and a 23 percent marketability discount) in valuing the decedent's 94.83 percent limited partnership interest in an FLP owning only cash and certificates of deposit. The Court also allowed the same 35 percent combined discount for the decedent's one third interest in the LLC that owned the 1 percent general partnership interest. It is interesting that before going to Court, IRS had agreed to a 25.2 percent combined discount for lack of control and marketability on a partnership that held nothing but cash and certificates of deposit (while the taxpayers had claimed a 53.5 percent combined discount for lack of control and marketability).

Download the case

Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.