Articles, Tax Practice Guides & Checklists, Comment Letters, Tools, etc.Discussion Forum, Tax Committees, Member PublicationsAICPA ConferencesTax Section Membership info.Publications, CPE, and Conferences
 
Search

Printer Friendly View

Tax E-Alerts

News you can use on tax regulations, court decisions, legislation, and practice management.

Read the Alerts




As a tax practitioner, you may have contemplated adding personal financial planning services to your practice. There is a natural progression to go from being your client's most trusted tax advisor to also being their most trusted personal financial advisor. But you have questions: will it be profitable? How do I get started? What are other CPA firms doing? All of these questions are addressed in a new research study published by the AICPA's PFP Section that can show you how to expand your services into this lucrative niche area that is a great compliment to your tax practice.

The Personal Financial Planning Section of AICPA and Moss Adams LLP are pleased to announce the results of their first joint study of CPA financial planning and advisory practices- AICPA/Moss Adams CPA Financial Planning Practice Study.

Click here for more information

 

January 30, 2006
AICPA Concerned About Capitalizing Environmental Remediation Costs

Mr. Eric Solomon

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy)

Department of Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20220

 

Mr. Donald Korb

Chief Counsel

Internal Revenue Service

1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20044

 

Mr. Thomas Barthold

Acting Chief of Staff

Joint Committee on Taxation

1015 Longworth

Washington, DC 20515

 

Re: Rev. Rul. 2005-42 Capitalization of Environmental Remediation Expenditures

 

Dear Messrs. Solomon, Korb and Barthold:

 

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) offers the attached comments to highlight our significant tax policy and administrative concerns regarding Rev. Rul. 2005-42, which generally requires capitalization of environmental remediation expenditures under section 263A. These comments were developed by the AICPA’s Tax Accounting Technical Resource Panel and approved by the Tax Executive Committee.

 

The AICPA believes that environmental remediation costs should not be capitalized under section 263A. If capitalization is used, Rev. Rul. 2005-42’s analogy of remediation costs to repair expenses is incorrect. Finally, even if this analogy is correct, some fact patterns in Rev. Rul. 2005-42 treat remediation costs inconsistently with repairs. We are also concerned that the procedural rules for filing accounting method change applications to conform to this ruling using a cut-off method do not provide adequate time for taxpayers to respond.

 

We appreciate your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions, please contact me at tpurcell@creighton.edu; Christine Turgeon, Chair, AICPA Tax Accounting Technical Resource Panel, at christine.turgeon@us.pwc.com; or George White, AICPA Technical Manager, at gwhite@aicpa.org.

 

Sincerely,

 

Thomas J. Purcell III

Chair, AICPA Tax Executive Committee

Download Comments

 

Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.