Articles, Tax Practice Guides & Checklists, Comment Letters, Tools, etc.Discussion Forum, Tax Committees, Member PublicationsAICPA ConferencesTax Section Membership info.Publications, CPE, and Conferences
 
Search

Printer Friendly View

Tax E-Alerts

News you can use on tax regulations, court decisions, legislation, and practice management.

Read the Alerts




As a tax practitioner, you may have contemplated adding personal financial planning services to your practice. There is a natural progression to go from being your client's most trusted tax advisor to also being their most trusted personal financial advisor. But you have questions: will it be profitable? How do I get started? What are other CPA firms doing? All of these questions are addressed in a new research study published by the AICPA's PFP Section that can show you how to expand your services into this lucrative niche area that is a great compliment to your tax practice.

The Personal Financial Planning Section of AICPA and Moss Adams LLP are pleased to announce the results of their first joint study of CPA financial planning and advisory practices- AICPA/Moss Adams CPA Financial Planning Practice Study.

Click here for more information

 

January 30, 2006
AICPA Asks IRS to Withdraw Proposed Section 752 Regs on Disregarded Entities

The Honorable Eric Solomon

Acting Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy)

U.S. Department of Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20220

 

The Honorable Mark W. Everson

Commissioner

Internal Revenue Service

1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20224

 

Re: Comments on REG-128767-04, Treatment of Disregarded Entities Under Section 752

 

Gentlemen:

 

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) offers the following comments on the above-mentioned proposed regulation project. These comments were drafted by the Partnership Taxation Technical Resource Panel and approved by the Tax Executive Committee.

 

We believe the Proposed Regulations create (1) unnecessary complexity for taxpayers by providing two separate regimes for determining the allocation of partnership liabilities; (2) uncertainty for taxpayers by allowing a Disregarded Entity to potentially impact the allocation of partnership liabilities; and (3) significant and unnecessary compliance burdens for taxpayers the goals of which can better be addressed through application and/or amplification of the existing Section 752 Anti-abuse Rule. As a result, we recommend that the Proposed Regulations be withdrawn.

 

If you or your staff have any questions, please contact me at tpurcell@creighton.edu; Debbie A. Fields, Chair of the AICPA Partnership Taxation Technical Resource Panel at dafields@kpmg.com; or Marc A. Hyman, AICPA Technical Manager at mhyman@aicpa.org.

 

Sincerely,

 

Thomas J. Purcell, Chair

Tax Executive Committee

Download Comments

Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.